32 | Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) Report

Table 2-1. Livestock production (million tonnes) past and projected.

Product
World
Sub-Saharan Africa
Year
1967/1969
2030
1969-1999
2015-2030
 
Million tonnes
Bovine meat
38.0
88.4
1.5
3.0
Ovine meat
6.6
20.1
2.8
3.0
Pig meat
34.1
124.5
n/a
n/a
Poultry meat
12.9
143.3
3.8
5.1
Milk
387
874
2.7
2.8
Eggs
18.7
89.9
3.7
4.1

Source: Bruinsma, 2003.

ing these industries is appropriate control of livestock and wildlife pests and diseases.


2.2.4.1 The livestock/wildlife interface in sub-Saharan Africa
In most of SSA livestock and wildlife share similar habitats and hence, at times compete for resources. This coexistence has never been easy and there has been a long-standing conflict between livestock owners and animal health authorities on the one hand and, wildlife conservationists on the other. This conflict is largely based on differing attitudes towards control of livestock diseases associated with wildlife. Livestock and wildlife disease problems are frequently bi-directional at the livestock/wildlife interface and the situation becomes more complex when humans are involved. Livestock and wildlife diseases can be grouped into three different categories as follows:
1.      Infectious diseases associated with wildlife known to cause           diseases in domestic livestock. The single most important factor           responsible for causing an outbreak of any of these diseases is           probably the direct or indirect (vector) contact of infected wild hosts           or populations with susceptible domestic animals at the interface of           their ranges, where mixing has occurred on common rangeland, or,           where other resources, like water are shared. Diseases in this           category include foot and mouth disease (FMD), African swine fever           (ASF) and classical swine fever (hog cholera), trypanosomiasis,           theileriosis or corridor diseases, African horse sickness, Rift Valley           fever (RVF), bluetongue, lumpy skin diseases, malignant catarrhal           fever and Newcastle disease (Bengis et al., 2002).
2.     Multispecies diseases that affect both livestock and wildlife.           Transmission of these diseases can occur in both directions,           although in certain regions, dominant role players have been           identified. These diseases are generally fatal to both wildlife and           livestock and are frequently zoonotic. Examples of such disease are           anthrax, rabies and brucellosis (Bengis et al., 2002). 3. Alien           diseases that infect wildlife and domestic livestock. Some of the           best examples in this category are certain diseases historically           alien to SSA, which were

 

          probably introduced into the African continent with the importation of           domestic livestock from Europe and Asia during the colonial era.           Indigenous African freeranging mammals are generally           susceptible to these foreign agents and significant morbidity and           mortality may be encountered in both wildlife and domestic           livestock. Such diseases include rinderpest, canine distemper,           bovine tuberculosis, African horse sickness and African swine           fever (Bengis et al., 2002).

2.2.4.2 Selected diseases and pests of livestock and wildlife
Rinderpest. Rinderpest is a viral disease introduced into Eritrea from India during the pre-colonial era either by the Italian army in 1887/1888, or by a German military expedition that brought infected cattle from Aden and Bombay to the East African coast. The disease killed more than 90% of all cattle population and wildlife (Henning, 1956). However, during this pre-colonial era, even without advanced technology, cattle farmers in South Africa managed to contain rinderpest through immunization of cattle, by using the bile of animals that died of the disease and, by end of 1898, the disease was under control and temporarily disappeared from South Africa. The disease resurfaced again in 1901 because cattle immunization against rinderpest was limited to South Africa and because SSA lacked strict border control (Henning, 1956). The situation remained unchanged during the colonial period, making rinderpest one of the most devastating diseases of both livestock and wildlife. Advances in AKST have created efficient vaccines to contain rinderpest and, currently, the disease is no longer a threat. Globalization has also played an important role and now, under the global rinderpest eradication program (GREP), a total of 25 SSA countries have managed to declare themselves or zones within their country free from this disease. In addition, six SSA countries have been declared rinderpest-free by the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) (OIE, 2007).

The eradication of rinderpest (not only in some SSA countries, but in most western and Asian countries) has been made possible through effective vaccination and modern diagnostic techniques. Although rinderpest is a disease of both