Moore, N.W. 1987. The bird of time. Cambridge
Univ. Press, Cambridge.
Morris, C. 2006. Negotiating the boundary between
state-led and farmer approaches to knowing
nature: An analysis of UK agri-environment
schemes. Geoforum 37(1):113-127.
Morris, C., and M. Winter. 1999. Integrated
farming systems: The third way for
European agriculture. Land Use Policy
16:193-205.
Morris, S.H. 2007. EU biotech crop regulations
and environmental risk: a case of the
emperor's new clothes? Trends Biotech.
25(1):2-6.
NAS. 1972. Report of the committee on research
advisory to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Nat. Acad. Press, Washington, DC.
NRC. 1994. Investing in the national research
initiative: An update of the competitive grants
program in the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Nat. Acad. Press, Washington, DC.
NRC. 2003. Frontiers in agricultural research:
Food, health, environment, and communities.
Nat. Acad. Press, Washington, DC.
Nickel, J.L. 1997. A global agricultural research
system for the 21st century. p. 139-155. In
C. Bontefriedheim and K. Sheridan (ed),
The globalization of science: The place of
agricultural research. ISNAR, The Hague.
Nipp, T. 2004. Agrosecurity: the role of the
agricultural experiment stations. J. Food
Sci. 69: CRH50-CRH54.
NRI. 2002. http://www.nri.org/about/history.
htm. Univ. of Greenwich, UK.
Odum, H.T. 1983. Systems ecology. Wiley,
New York.
Odum, H.T. 1988. Self organization, transformity,
and information. Science 242:1132-1139.
OECD. 1967. Agricultural policies in 1966.
OCED, Paris.
OECD. 1999. Summary and evaluation of main
developments and changes in organizational
forms of and approaches by the AKS
in OECD member countries. AGR/CA/
AKS (00), Direct. Food, Agric. Fisheries,
Committee for Agriculture, OECD, Paris.
OECD. 2002. Dynamizing national innovation
systems. OCED, Paris.
OECD. 2005a. Governance of innovation
systems. Vol 1. Synthesis report. Available
at http://www.oecd.org/document/25/0,234
0,en_2649_37417_35175257_1_1_1_3741
7,00.html. OECD, Paris.
OECD. 2005b. Governance of innovation
systems. Vol. 2: Case studies in innovation
policy. OECD, Paris.
OECD. 2005c. Governance of innovation
systems. Vol. 3. Case studies in cross-sectoral
policy. Available at http://www.oecd.org/docu
ment/12/0,2340,en_2649_37417_35791756_
1_1_1_37417,00.html. OECD, Paris.
OECD. 2006a. Factbook 2006. OECD, Paris.
OECD. 2006b. Main science and technology
indicators, 2006-1. OECD, Paris.
OTA. 1992. New technological era for
American agriculture. US Gov. Printing
Off., Washington, DC.

Olmstead, A.L., and P. Rhodes. 1994. The
agricultural mechanization controversy of
the interwar years. Agric. Hist. 68:3.
OSI. 2006. Science review of the Department
for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.
Available at http://www.dti.gov.uk/science/
science-in-govt/works/science-reviews/
review/defra/page24808.html. UK Off. Sci.
Innov., London.
Ostrom, M., and D. Jackson-Smith. 2005.
Denning a purpose: Diverse farm
constituencies and publicly funded
agricultural research and extension. J. Sustain.
Agric. 27:57-76.
Pardey, P.G., J.M. Alston, J.E. Christian, and
S. Fan. 1996. Hidden harvest: U.S. benefits
from international research aid. Food Policy
Report. IFPRI, Washington, DC.
Pardey, P.G., and N.M. Beintema. 2001. Slow
magic: Agricultural R&D a century after
Mendel. IFPRI, Washington, DC.
Pardey, P.G., N. Beintema, S. Dehmer, and
S. Wood. 2006. Agricultural research. A
growing global divide? IFPRI, Washington,
DC.
Pawson, E., and S. Dovers. 2003.
Environmental history and the challenges
of interdisciplinarity: An antipodean
perspective. Environ. Hist. 9:53-75.
Pidgeon, N.F., W. Poortinga, G. Rowe,
T. Horlick-Jones, J. Walls, and T. O'Riordan.
2005. Using surveys in public participation
processes for risk decision making: The
case of the 2003 British GM Nation? public
debate. Risk Analy. 25(2):467-479.
Porter, A., and F.A. Rossini. 1984.
Interdisciplinary research redefined. Multiskill,
problem focused research in the STRAP
framework. R&D Manage. 14(2):105-111.
Pray, C.E., J. Huang, R. Hu, and S. Rozelle.
2002. Five years of Bt cotton in China—the
benefits continue. Plant J. 31:423-430.
Pretty, J. 1995. Regenerating agriculture:
Policies and practice for self-reliance.
Earthscan, London.
Pretty, J.N., A.D. Noble, D. Bossio, J. Dixon,
R.E. Hine, F.W.T. Penning de Vries, et al.
2006. Resource-conserving agriculture
increases yields in developing countries.
Environ. Sci. Tech. 40:1114-1119.
Qin, J., F.W. Lancaster, and B. Allen. 1997.
Types and levels of collaboration in
interdiscpilinary research in the sciences.
J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. 48(19):893-916.
Rao, S.S. 2005. Bridging digital divide: Efforts
in India. Telemat. Inform. 22(4):361-375.
RCEP. 1989. Thirteenth report: The release
of genetically engineered organisms to the
environment. R. Comm. Environ. Pollution,
HMSO, London.
Read, N., J.J. Quinn, and A. Webster. 1988.
Commercialisation as a policy mechanism
in UK agricultural research, development
and extension. Agric. Syst. 26:77-87.
Rhodes, F.H.T. 2001. The creation of the
future. The role of the American university.
Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca.

Robb, C. 1998. PPA's: A review of the World
Bank's experience. p. 131-142. In
J. Holland and J. Blackburn (ed), Who's
voice? Participatory research and policy
change. IT Publ., London.
Rockefeller Foundation. 1982. Science for
agriculture. Rockefeller Foundation,
New York.
Romig, D.E., M.J. Garlynd, R.F. Harris, and
K. McSweeney. 1995. How farmers assess
soil health and soil quality. J. Soil Water
Conserv. 50:229-236.
Romig, D.E., M.J. Garlynd, and R.F. Harris.
1996. Farmer-based assessment of soil
quality: A soil health scorecard. In Methods
for assessing soil quality. Spec. Publ. 49.
Available at http://www.cias.wisc.edu/wicst/
pubs/farmer_based.htm. SSSA, Madison, WI.
Rothamsted International 2007. http://www
.rothamsted-international.org.
Roy, D.B., D.A. Bohan, A.J. Haughton,
M.O. Hill, J.L. Osborne, S.J. Clark, et
al. 2003. Invertebrates and vegetation of
field margins adjacent to crops subject to
contrasting herbicide regimes in the farm
scale evaluations of genetically modified
herbicide-tolerant crops. Phil. Trans. R. Soc.
London B 358:1879-1898.
Roy, S. 1990. Agriculture and technology in
developing countries: India and Nigeria.
Sage, New Delhi.
Rubenstein, K.D., P.W. Heisey, C. Klotz-
Ingram, and G.B. Frisvold. 2003.
Competitive grants and the funding of
agricultural research in the U.S. Rev. Agric.
Econ. 25(2):352-368.
Rubenstein, K.D., and P.W. Heisey. 2005. Can
technology transfer help public-sector
researchers do more with less? The case of
the USDA's Agricultural Research Service.
AgBioForum 8(2/3):134-142.
Rubenstein, K.D., P. Heisey, and
D. Schimmelpfennig. 2007. Sources of
public agricultural R&D changing. Amber
Waves 5(3):7.
Ruttan, V.W. 1982. Agricultural research policy.
Univ. Minneapolis Press, Minnesota.
Ryan, J.G. 2001. Synthesis report on workshop
assessing the impact of policy-oriented
social science research. Scheveningen,
the Netherlands, 12-13 Nov. IFPRI,
Washington, DC.
Sabatier, P.A., and H.C. Jenkins Smith. 1993.
Policy change and learning: An advocacy
coalition approach. Westview Press,
Colorado.
Schienstock, G. (ed). 2004. Embracing
the knowledge economy. The dynamic
transformation of the Finnish innovation
system. New horizons in the economics of
innovation. Edward Elgar, London.
Scholz, R., and D. Marks. 2001. Learning
about transdisciplinarity: Where are we?
Where have we been? Where should we go?
p. 236-252. In Transdisciplinarity: Joint
problem solving among science, technology
and society. Birkhäuser, Basel.