Previous | Return to table of contents | Search Reports | Next |
« Back to weltagrarbericht.de |
128 | North America and Europe (NAE) Report
Table 4-2. Types of participation in development.
|
Type of Participation |
Characteristic |
1. |
Manipulative |
A pretence (no real power). For example, the presence of "people's" representatives on a board or committee, but who are outnumbered by external agents. |
2. |
Passive |
People told about a decision or what has already happened, with no ability to change it. |
3. |
Consultative |
People answer questions. The form of the questions and analysis of results is done by external agents. |
4. |
Material Incentive |
People contribute resources (e.g., land, labor) in return for some incentive. |
5. |
Functional |
Participation seen by external agents as a means to achieve goals (e.g., reduce costs) usually after major decisions have already been made. |
6. |
Interactive |
People involved in analysis and development of action plans, for example. Participation is seen as a right and not just as a mechanical function. |
7. |
Self-mobilization |
People mobilize themselves and initiate actions without the involvement of any external agency, although the latter can help with an enabling framework. |
Source: Pretty, 1995; Buhler et al., 2002.
ideas as lifelong learning, communicative learning (Leeu-wis, 2004) and collective learning (societal learning) as well as participatory approaches have led to the development of innovation systems and processes within AKST. Inclusion of multiple knowledge bases, feedback loops and learning processes now aim to enable those involved to respond to emerging unpredictable circumstances. The concept is still evolving and requires more analysis of the agents involved, their behavior, the diverse interactions that characterize it (Spielman, 2005) as well as techniques and procedures to include actors to create knowledge for use and diffusion. 4.4.2 Alternatives in integration |
|
the emergence of new research fields, i.e., in scientific renewal and development. Thinking collectively about complex problems requires crossing boundaries both horizontally (across disciplines) and vertically (involving policy-makers, experts, practitioners, public) (Klein, 2004). This leads to participatory approaches and transdisciplinarity and thus problem solving that crosses both disciplinary boundaries and sectors of society (Scholz and Marks, 2001). It can also involve efforts towards a new unifying theory. For example, it has been proposed that agroecology could be developed and defined as an embracing discipline for studies on the entire agrifood system in all its ecological, economic and social dimensions (e.g., Dalgaard et al., 2003; Francis et al., 2003). 8 This would be the case even if the development of the new disciplines would be based on the unifying and expanding "rhizome model" rather than the more commonly used hierarchical model, which involves branching into distinct, semiau-tonomous fields of enquiry (Bruun et al., 2005). |
Previous | Return to table of contents | Search Reports | Next |
« Back to weltagrarbericht.de |