84 | Latin America and the Caribbean Report.

Table 2-1. Problems common to NARIs in LAC (Most outstanding examples).

(a) Limited inter-institutional collaboration

Mutual antagonism and lack of cooperation between the institutions in charge of agricultural research and universities and university faculties involved in agriculture.
Ineffectual links between plant and livestock research.
Insufficient use of socioeconomic disciplines.
Research on production and on-farm systems relegated to isolated, separate organizational units. Insufficient support for the concept that researchers should carry out research on-farm from a production systems perspective.
Ineffective linkages between research and extension activities.
Limited interaction and linkages between public and private bodies engaged in agricultural research.
Insufficient participation of producers in the definition of research agendas and the evaluation of results.
Dispersion of agricultural research over a large number of ministries and other agencies.
Excessive intra-institutional fractioning, with researchers and other team members spread over too many small experimental stations or scientific fields, leading to the lack of a critical mass for the efficient use of infrastructure and proper supervision, tutoring, and collaboration.

(b) Resource problems

Severe lack of resources.
Allocation of resources by crop, system, product or research area that do not reflect national priorities and the needs of producers.
Diluted distribution of scarce resources among a large number of crops or research areas without the necessary setting of priorities.
Inappropriate balance of resources (the greatest percentage of budgets is assigned to paying for salaries, leaving insufficient resources for operations).
A resource allocation process that is too centralized.
Excessive dependence on resources from externally financed projects for the acquisition of equipment and vehicles.
Inefficient use of costly equipment and specialized infrastructure due to their dispersion and fractioning, aggravated by ineffectual linkages.
Budgetary allocation guided more by experimental station than by research area.
Budgets are more a compilation of “requests” than tools for the effective allocation of resources.

(c) Organizational and managerial weaknesses

Hierarchical organizational structures and attitudes instead of “flatter” structures linked to a more collegiate management style more conducive to scientific innovation.
Insufficient delegation of authority.
Purchase of inputs that is subject to complex and slow bureaucratic procedures.
Lack of management information (information systems).
Inappropriate procedures for the preparation and revision of budgets.
Inadequate research planning and follow-up.

(d) Organizational and personnel weaknesses

Hierarchical organizational structures and attitudes, instead of “flatter” structures linked to a more collegiate management style that is more conducive to scientific innovation.
Insufficient delegation of authority.
Lack or weaknesses in assessing individual performance.
Promotion based on seniority rather than on merit.
Heads of institutions or units not chosen on the basis on their administrative performance.
Inadequate training regarding leadership, administration, and management.
Lack of incentives.
Lack of flexibility in civil service regulations regarding the administration of human resources dedicated to agricultural research.

Source: Nickel, 1996.