Previous | Return to table of contents | Search Reports | Next |
« Back to weltagrarbericht.de |
Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology: Investment and Economic Returns | 529
Governance can also be viewed at multiple levels; at the level of a research station, a national research system, a regional research network as well as at the global level. When we analyze the issues of governance of a research station, we take the external environment including the objectives given to the station as exogenous, and try to see how the governance of the station can be improved to meet these given objectives within the resource constraints. One can also analyze the larger question of governance at which one critically looks at whether the objectives defined by, or resources given to the station are appropriate and meet the criteria of good governance. Based on the conceptual framework as given here, one can develop a set of questions that are relevant for analyzing the governance of, and institutions involved in AKST investments (Table 8-19). 8.3.3 Analyzing the experience of governing AKST investments 8.3.3.1 Public funding/public sector research |
|
of countries to carry out good quality research. In many poor countries, there would not have been any significant level of agricultural R&D without these institutions due to the limited capacity as well as inadequate interest of the private or not-for-profit sectors to provide agricultural R&D, which mostly falls in the public good domain. Government-funding for AKST has also played an important role in enhancing the awareness of farmers, in creating a wide pool of trained personnel and informing policy making at the national level in a number of countries. |
Table 8-19. Guiding questions for institutional assessment on governance.
Issue/Actor |
Guiding Question 2. What is the appropriate intervention given the objectives in the agricultural sector? 3. What is the problem of market failure to be addressed? 4. What is the institutional mechanism required given the problem of market failure? 5. How to ensure that governance decisions are accountable and transparent? 6. Is the institutional arrangement capable of meeting the objective? 7. Is the institutional arrangement capable of internalizing the requirements or demands of its potential clients? 8. Is the institutional arrangement leading to efficient decisions given its alternatives? 9. Does the arrangement have flexibility to evolve in tune with the changing socioeconomic realities? 10. What kind of feedback is likely to be generated by the organizations operating within this institutional framework? 11 .Are the incentives (monetary as well as other nonmonetary rewards) of the individual actors aligned with the stated objectives of the organizations? |
Previous | Return to table of contents | Search Reports | Next |
« Back to weltagrarbericht.de |