76 | IAASTD Global Report

Table 2-3 Analytic map of the main features of AKST for development paradigms.

Label Features of Production System Features of AKST Direct Drivers Indirect Drivers
Pre-modern/ Traditional Diverse products locally; "natural" systems; small-scale units;
local/recycled inputs
Local knowledge generation and repositories Biophysical: soils, local climate
Resources: labor availability
Social factors: mutual help, social capital
Economic: local economy/ food need
Policy and economic: tax systems, access to markets
Social: cultural practices related to farming
Cognitive: focus on meeting local needs
Industrial agriculture in capitalist contexts Mechanization; less diverse products- greater specialization;
larger scale units external inputs; private sector production
Formal R&D (public and private); dissemination of knowledge Cognitive: profit and yield maximization through science
Policy: subsidy for production goals
Economic: agribusiness corporations
Institutional: formal research institutions
Social and economic: consumer demand
Trade: international trade agreements
Economic: cheap energy; externalization of health and environmental costs
Industrial agriculture in socialist contexts Mechanization; larger scale units; external inputs; collective ownership of resources (labor, land); central planning Public sector R&D, dissemination by state institutions Policy: national food selfsufficiency
Institutional: funding for research/extension
High external input intensive agriculture in south (e.g., Green Revolution; some plantation systems) HYVs; package of external inputs; pest management and nutrient management through chemical inputs National agric. universities and research stations; CGIAR; global transfer through aid agencies/ projects; local knowledge has little influence Cognitive: increase production to keep up with population; science provides solutions
Policy: state support/ subsidy
Institutional: research community
Technological: growth of new technologies
Trade: focus on export-led growth
Economic and policy: post-colonial drive for food self-sufficiency
Cognitive: faith in rational science & expert advice Globalization and trade: multinational agribusiness and agrochemical corporations; aid conditionalities
Social: loss of local knowledge; perceived inefficiencies in previous production systems
Low external input agriculture in South (not necessarily sustainable) Marginal land resources; low yields; low priority crops (national and trade perspective); prone to natural shocks; minimal use of synthetic inputs Little attention from formal R&D; reliance on local knowledge and innovation Institutional and policy: low provision of credit and technical assistance Institutional and policy: high potential lands have been prioritized
Trade: low value of output means little attention from input manufacturers and agribusiness

continued next page

with R&D providers. Many now have websites that act as an information umbrella for and communication link to thousands of affiliated farmers' groups organized at local levels. Examples include the Network of Farmers' Organizations and Agricultural Producers from western Africa (http://www.roppa-ao.org); the International Land Coalition (www.landcoalition.org/partners/partact.htm); the International Federation of Agricultural Producers (www.ifap.org); and Peasants Worldwide (www.agroinfo .nl/scripts/website.asp).

     The focus on local mobilization masks the wide scale of effort and impact (Boven and Mordhashi, 2002). For example, in 2004 Catholic Relief Services was working directly with 120,000 poor producers in community-based seed

 

system development (www.crs.org) and South East Asian Regional Initiatives for Community Empowerment (SEARICE) (see 2.2.3). The local seeds movement pioneered by such organizations has given rise to information exchange networks that assert individual and community rights to "first publication" so as to safeguard native IPR and germplasm. Over time, such organizations have strengthened their own R&D networks by commissioning research and through organizing national and international technical conferences, such as the International Farmers' Technical Conference held in conjunction with the 2005 Convention on Biodiversity meeting.

     Farmer research partnerships typically bring together farmers, professors, scientists and researchers to compose a