Previous | Return to table of contents | Search Reports | Next |
« Back to weltagrarbericht.de |
76 | IAASTD Global Report
Table 2-3 Analytic map of the main features of AKST for development paradigms.
Label | Features of Production System | Features of AKST | Direct Drivers | Indirect Drivers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Pre-modern/ Traditional | Diverse products
locally; "natural"
systems; small-scale
units; local/recycled inputs |
Local knowledge generation and repositories | Biophysical: soils, local
climate Resources: labor availability Social factors: mutual help, social capital Economic: local economy/ food need |
Policy and economic: tax systems,
access to markets Social: cultural practices related to farming Cognitive: focus on meeting local needs |
Industrial agriculture in capitalist contexts | Mechanization; less
diverse products-
greater specialization; larger scale units external inputs; private sector production |
Formal R&D (public and private); dissemination of knowledge | Cognitive: profit and yield
maximization through
science Policy: subsidy for production goals Economic: agribusiness corporations Institutional: formal research institutions |
Social and economic: consumer
demand Trade: international trade agreements Economic: cheap energy; externalization of health and environmental costs |
Industrial agriculture in socialist contexts | Mechanization; larger scale units; external inputs; collective ownership of resources (labor, land); central planning | Public sector R&D, dissemination by state institutions | Policy: national food selfsufficiency Institutional: funding for research/extension |
|
High external input intensive agriculture in south (e.g., Green Revolution; some plantation systems) | HYVs; package of external inputs; pest management and nutrient management through chemical inputs | National agric. universities and research stations; CGIAR; global transfer through aid agencies/ projects; local knowledge has little influence | Cognitive: increase
production to keep up
with population; science
provides solutions Policy: state support/ subsidy Institutional: research community Technological: growth of new technologies Trade: focus on export-led growth |
Economic and policy: post-colonial
drive for food self-sufficiency Cognitive: faith in rational science & expert advice Globalization and trade: multinational agribusiness and agrochemical corporations; aid conditionalities Social: loss of local knowledge; perceived inefficiencies in previous production systems |
Low external input agriculture in South (not necessarily sustainable) | Marginal land resources; low yields; low priority crops (national and trade perspective); prone to natural shocks; minimal use of synthetic inputs | Little attention from formal R&D; reliance on local knowledge and innovation | Institutional and policy: low provision of credit and technical assistance | Institutional and policy: high
potential lands have been
prioritized Trade: low value of output means little attention from input manufacturers and agribusiness |
continued next page
with R&D providers. Many now have websites that act as an information umbrella for and communication link to thousands of affiliated farmers' groups organized at local levels. Examples include the Network of Farmers' Organizations and Agricultural Producers from western Africa (http://www.roppa-ao.org); the International Land Coalition (www.landcoalition.org/partners/partact.htm); the International Federation of Agricultural Producers (www.ifap.org); and Peasants Worldwide (www.agroinfo .nl/scripts/website.asp). The focus on local mobilization masks the wide scale of effort and impact (Boven and Mordhashi, 2002). For example, in 2004 Catholic Relief Services was working directly with 120,000 poor producers in community-based seed |
system development (www.crs.org) and South East Asian Regional Initiatives for Community Empowerment (SEARICE) (see 2.2.3). The local seeds movement pioneered by such organizations has given rise to information exchange networks that assert individual and community rights to "first publication" so as to safeguard native IPR and germplasm. Over time, such organizations have strengthened their own R&D networks by commissioning research and through organizing national and international technical conferences, such as the International Farmers' Technical Conference held in conjunction with the 2005 Convention on Biodiversity meeting. Farmer research partnerships typically bring together farmers, professors, scientists and researchers to compose a |
Previous | Return to table of contents | Search Reports | Next |
« Back to weltagrarbericht.de |