Previous | Return to table of contents | Search Reports | Next |
« Back to weltagrarbericht.de |
44 | East and South Asia and the Pacific (ESAP) Report
Table 2-5. Rank of World Competitiveness (by Factor) of selected countries, 2006.
Factor |
Singapore |
China |
Malaysia |
India |
Thailand |
Korea |
Philippines |
Indonesia |
Overall Rank |
3 |
19 |
23 |
29 |
32 |
38 |
49 |
60 |
1. Economic performance |
4 |
3 |
11 |
7 |
21 |
41 |
52 |
61 |
2. Government efficiency |
2 |
17 |
20 |
35 |
21 |
47 |
45 |
51 |
3. Business efficiency |
7 |
30 |
20 |
19 |
28 |
45 |
44 |
57 |
4. Infrastructure |
5 |
37 |
31 |
54 |
48 |
24 |
56 |
61 |
(a) Basic infrastructure |
1 |
20 |
35 |
33 |
38 |
29 |
61 |
53 |
(b) Technological infrastructure |
3 |
33 |
21 |
43 |
48 |
6 |
37 |
61 |
(c) Scientific infrastructure |
16 |
17 |
38 |
26 |
53 |
12 |
58 |
47 |
(d) Health and environment |
15 |
51 |
39 |
57 |
48 |
32 |
53 |
61 |
(e) Education |
13 |
51 |
30 |
59 |
48 |
42 |
57 |
61 |
Source: World Competitiveness Center, 2006.
from less cropland. A large body of evidence closely links improved productivity to investment in agricultural research and development, averaging rates of return of over 40%, particularly for commodities with short production cycles (Byerlee et al., 2006). It is not surprising that in 2000, US$731 billion was invested in sciences worldwide, including public and private research. This represents less than 2% of the world's US$42.4 trillion gross domestic product for that year and an increase of nearly one-third over the inflation adjusted total of just five years earlier (Pardey et al., 2006). |
|
and the miniscule percentage of gross research and development spending for domestic AKST. The overall growth in ESAP masked that this investment was concentrated in only a handful of countries. China, India and Japan accounted for nearly 85% of the region's scientific spending in 1995, climbing to 87% by 2000. In contrast, research spending by most of the other 24 ESAP countries declined about 2%. Agricultural research and development expenditure in 2000 was a mere 5% of global science spending. Funding for AKST within ESAP, with the exception of six industrial countries, Australia, China, India, Japan, New Zealand and South Korea, could be characterized as perennially dismal and declining, if not outright stagnant, with the public sector shouldering the bulk, 92%, of the expenditures. Three typical major funding sources for public research and development were production or export taxes, direct government appropriations and external sources (Dar, 1995). |
Table 2-6. Overall World Competitiveness Ranking of selected countries, 2003-2006.
Country |
2003 (of 61 countries) |
2004 (of 61 countries) |
2005 (of 61 countries) |
2006 (of 61 countries) |
Singapore |
4 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
Japan |
25 |
23 |
21 |
17 |
China |
29 |
24 |
31 |
19 |
Malaysia |
21 |
16 |
28 |
23 |
India |
50 |
34 |
39 |
29 |
Thailand |
30 |
29 |
27 |
32 |
Korea, Rep. |
37 |
35 |
29 |
38 |
Philippines |
49 |
52 |
49 |
49 |
Indonesia |
57 |
58 |
59 |
60 |
Note: The rankings are based on four factors: (1) Economic performance; (2) Government efficiency; (3) Business efficiency; and (4) Infrastructure. The technological and scientific infrastructures are under the fourth factor.
Source: World Competitiveness Center, 2006.
Previous | Return to table of contents | Search Reports | Next |
« Back to weltagrarbericht.de |