84 | Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) Report

fuel wood and charcoal, and would also serve as an energy source for small and medium scale industries. Forests and agroforestry systems will become even more important for protecting watersheds as climate change effects become pronounced in the sub-region (IPCC, 2007). Forest biodiversity will continue to be important for the nutrition (e.g., bush meat as a source of protein), health (medicinal plants) and livelihoods of people in the sub-region. The economies of SSA countries would also be affected positively, as export of non-timber forest products (e.g., curios, bushmeat and medicinal plants), increases due to increased demand by the large number of sub-Saharan Africans in the diaspora.

 There have been various assessments on forests in SSA. The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA) based on the Zambezi Basin case study predicts a continuing decline in forest diversity towards 2050, although the rates of decline vary among scenarios (MA, 2005abc). The main driver for the decline in forest genetic resources is expected to be habitat loss resulting from changes in land use. The causes attributed to future habitat loss include land expansion for agriculture and deforestation.

 A projection to 2020 in SSA shows that rates of deforestation in East and West Africa will not change significantly (FAO, 2003). In East Africa the continued deforestation will be associated with population growth, intense land use conflicts and poor economic growth. In West Africa continued deforestation will also be associated with land use conflicts. In both Central and Southern Africa deforestation is expected to occur at a higher rate than now, causing a rapid decline in forests. Deforestation in Central Africa will be caused by increased logging, increased road construction and land use conversion. In Southern Africa land reforms in Zimbabwe and expansion of commercial agriculture in Mozambique and Angola are projected to lead to rapid deforestation (FAO, 2003). In the second Africa Environment Outlook (AEO 2) projections on forest systems towards 2050 were based on forest assessments in Central Africa (UNEP, 2006a). Four scenarios resulted in different outcomes under different policies. Under a Market Forces scenario, forests will continue to decline but at a slower rate, due to policies that promote afforestation and sustainable use and management of forests. In the Policy Reform scenario, there is also a decline in the rate of loss. This decline however, is due to decreased demand in fuel wood and charcoal. The Fortress World scenario predicts high rates of deforestation and degradation of forest lands due to commercial over-exploitation of resources and pressure from the rural poor. However, because of international conventions, some forests remain. In the Great Transitions scenario, there is an increase in forest cover and improvement in forest quality. This increase will be brought about by an appreciation of the value of forest resources, improved forest management, sustainable use
of forestry and improved livelihoods. There is evidence for both pessimistic and optimistic views concerning forest projections (FAO, 2003; MA, 2005a; UNEP, 2006b).

 The move towards democratic decision making, transparency and participation of the populace in governance in countries of SSA will have an impact on the state of forest genetic resources towards 2050. For example, The New African initiative focusing primarily on African ownership and

 

management is setting the agenda for renewal of the state of the continent (NEPAD, 2001). The initiative seeks to determine national and regional priorities and development plans through participatory processes involving the people. Some countries are already having a paradigm shift in the role of the public sector from control to policy formulation and support for community participation in the management of forest resources. National governments are involving communities in the management and sustainable use of forests and their resources. The case of the Communal Areas Management Programme for Indigenous Resources (CAMPFIRE) in Zimbabwe, and the successful management of the Duru-Haitemba and Mgori forests in southern Tanzania are examples of how community involvement in the management of forest resources could result in a win-win situation. East Africa, especially Kenya and Tanzania, have attempted similar efforts to integrate wildlife and livestock management. Involving local communities and ensuring equitable sharing of benefits with communities are essential to sustainable management of protected area (Box 4-1).

 The vigorous pursuance of these good practices across SSA would reverse the trend of forest genetic decline and enhance/improve the quality and quantity of forest genetic resources and the services they provide for people.

Forest Productivity
The future of forest productivity in SSA remains uncertain (Kirschbaum, 2004). Sub-Saharan Africa’s share of global wood production is projected to decline as value-added processing increases. Global trade in processed goods is projected to increase out to 2050; however, in SSA trade will be limited unless there are enabling policies and capital investments in technology and capacity development (FAO, 2003). Over the next decades South Africa will be the leader in exports of high value wood products because of projected capacity development. If West African economies improve,
exports of high value wood products will predominate.

 The future of non-wood forest products (NWFPs) is uncertain. Currently NWFP including plants used for food, drink, fodder, fuel and medicine and animals and their products, are important in all sub-regions of SSA for subsistence and income generation, and especially for rural livelihoods. NWFPs have potential value in local (Fondoun and Manga, 2000; Sonne, 2001; Adu-Anning, 2004; Ndam, 2004; Ngono and Ndoye, 2004), national (Russo et al., 1996; Tieguhong, 2003), regional (Ngono and Ndoye, 2004) and international trade (Ndam, 2004; Ndoye and Tieguhong, 2004). The discovery of more NWFPs of international value will improve incomes and livelihoods in the sub-region. Good examples include the Batanai Group in the Rushinga District of Zimbabwe, involved in the commercial extraction of marula oil, and the Mapanja Prunus Harvesters’ Union in Cameroon, who harvest and trade in Prunus africana on Mount Cameroon. The lack of regulatory frameworks has created an environment in which the informal sector and market forces dominate trade in NFWPs and therefore accurate data and projections on their trade are scarce (FAO, 2003). In the case of East Africa, it is expected that the provision of tax incentives would result in value addition to NWFPs by local communities and the private sector.